Article “TIME (スガシカオのアルバム)” in Japanese Wikipedia has 4.2 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 0 references and 5 sections.
In June 2025 the article “TIME (スガシカオのアルバム)” was edited by 1 authors in Japanese Wikipedia and written by 1 authors in all languages.
Since the creation of article “TIME (スガシカオのアルバム)”, its content was written by 20 registered users of Japanese Wikipedia and edited by 20 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 65 times in Japanese Wikipedia and cited 65 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Japanese: #207114 09.2011 |
Global: #1336058 09.2011 |
| Best Rank | Japanese: #11567 01.2008 |
Global: #268023 01.2008 |
On 28 January 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 2025–26 UEFA Champions League, Nipah virus, Doomsday Clock, UEFA Champions League, Elena Rybakina, Donald Trump, 2026 European Men's Handball Championship, killing of Alex Pretti, Kristi Noem, deaths in 2026.
In Japanese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: 羽月隆太郎, 塩屋浩三, 大石晃子, 唐橋ユミ, ディアトロフ峠事件, 岩城滉一, 塩屋翼, M!LK, 濱正悟, 森下千里.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.68+0+0+16.13+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
